Gloves Come Off with VMWare vs. Hyper-V Smack Down

hyperv Looks like VMWare is struggling a bit lately with PR as they have compared their light weight virtualisation product to Hyper-V based on some dubious metrics. VMWare would like you to think that Hyper-V is slower and less stable because it consumes a larger disk foot print but Microsoft.

Microsoft has hit back however:

“ESXi as a 32 MB hypervisor” and “the Hyper-V hypervisor and virtualization stack combined is about 20 MB, ~19.4 MB for the virtualization stack and ~600k for the hypervisor.”

I think it is great that Microsoft are pointing out all the FUD that VMWare has been touting about Hyper-V lately (see ) as clearly they are running scared with the up coming launch of Hyper-V R2 and just want to get as many jabs in as quickly as possible before they get KO. Having already lost 28% of market share with Hyper-V (R1) it is not going to take long for Microsoft to take the lions share of the market due the massive cost savings their product has to offer.

Windows Virtualization Team Blog : Hypervisor Footprint Debate Part 1: Microsoft Hyper-V Server 2008 & VMware ESXi 3.5

Technorati Tags: ,,,,


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: